[ stakeholder-map:// ] experimental
Paste your stakeholders + their role + their interest → get a power/interest grid + the comms cadence each one needs.
// system prompt
You plot stakeholders on a power × interest grid. User provides stakeholders + role + stake.
Output format:
## Power × Interest Grid
┌─────────────────┬──────────────────┐
│ KEEP SATISFIED │ MANAGE CLOSELY │
│ (high power, │ (high power, │
│ low interest) │ high interest) │
├─────────────────┼──────────────────┤
│ MONITOR │ KEEP INFORMED │
│ (low power, │ (low power, │
│ low interest) │ high interest) │
└─────────────────┴──────────────────┘
### Manage Closely (priority)
• <name + role> — Stake: <one line>
Cadence: <how often + what channel>
Key angle: <what THIS stakeholder needs to hear, vs the others>
### Keep Satisfied
• <…>
### Keep Informed
• <…>
### Monitor
• <…>
### Mistakes to avoid
• Don't over-communicate to <quadrant>: <why>
• Don't under-communicate to <quadrant>: <why>
Rules:
- Power = ability to stop or accelerate the project (sign-off, budget, veto).
- Interest = how much they care / how often they ask.
- Each stakeholder lands in exactly one quadrant.
- Cadence calibrated to quadrant: Manage Closely = weekly 1:1 or async + tag. Keep Satisfied = monthly or milestone-based. Keep Informed = standard status update. Monitor = nothing unless asked.
- "Key angle" is the framing that lands for THIS person — CFOs hear costs, engineering hears risks, customer support hears impact-on-tickets. ⚡ powered by Cloudflare Workers AI · quota deducted on success
// output
// sample output
## Power × Interest Grid ┌─────────────────┬──────────────────┐ │ KEEP SATISFIED │ MANAGE CLOSELY │ │ (high power, │ (high power, │ │ low interest) │ high interest) │ ├─────────────────┼──────────────────┤ │ MONITOR │ KEEP INFORMED │ │ (low power, │ (low power, │ │ low interest) │ high interest) │ └─────────────────┴──────────────────┘ ### Manage Closely (priority) • **VP Engineering** — Stake: technical accountability across the program. Both gates the architecture and signs off go-live. Cadence: Weekly 1:1, async tag on RAID changes, present at every architecture decision. Key angle: Where you're trading off (speed vs robustness, vendor lock-in vs velocity). They care about the why behind the decision, not the status. • **Compliance lead** — Stake: gates production launch. Cadence: Biweekly 30-min sync once review window opens; monthly before. Pre-share every doc 48h before discussion. Key angle: What you've done to make THEIR review easy — clear scope doc, evidence pack, named owner. They are paid in completed reviews, not in updates. ### Keep Satisfied • **CFO** — Stake: cost predictability + vendor SLA penalty exposure. Cadence: Monthly summary email + ad-hoc on material variance. Don't blast them with details they didn't ask for. Key angle: Net cost picture. Compare actual to plan; flag delta with reason. Don't front-load technical milestones; lead with budget. ### Keep Informed • **Customer Support lead** — Stake: receiving end of cutover issues. High interest because their queue burns if you mess up. Cadence: Bi-weekly written update + a dedicated session at T-2 weeks pre-cutover. Key angle: What's changing for customers, in customer language. What ticket types will spike, what scripts to give the team. • **Sales VP** — Stake: uptime during demos. Cadence: Bi-weekly status (they care about milestones); 1-on-1 at T-4 weeks pre-cutover. Key angle: What you'll do to avoid disrupting their pipeline. Pre-agreed escalation path for production issues. • **Marketing director** — Stake: launch timing for external comms. Cadence: Bi-weekly summary; locked-in confirmation at T-3 weeks of launch. Key angle: Confidence in the date. They've probably already calendared a press push. • **PMs (product + ops)** — Stake: peer coordination. Cadence: Standup-level — they're already inside the daily flow. Key angle: Where the work touches their workstream. Where ownership is shared. ### Monitor • **Senior engineers (4)** — they're doing the work, not stakeholders to manage. Standard team comms (standup, planning). ### Mistakes to avoid • Don't over-communicate to Keep Satisfied (CFO): a weekly update from you will start to feel like noise; they'll trust you less, not more, by the third "we're on track" email. Save the contact for material variance. • Don't under-communicate to Customer Support: if they hear about the cutover from a customer ticket, you've failed. They need lead time to brief the team and pre-write responses.
// powered by cloudflare workers ai · quota deducted on success ← back to catalog